soxfirst
Heat on Citigroup case
Filed in archive litigation by leon on March 13, 2007
Heat on Citigroup case
Interesting development in the Australian corporate regulator's insider trading conflict of interest lawsuit against Citigroup (that's Citigroup's Sydney headquarters in the photo).

The Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), which represents investment banks and brokers, has made a last minute bid to intervene in the case which starts at the end of this month.

I have been told by an absolutely unimpeachable source that AFMA has poked its head up on the request of a prominent New York Investment bank. Not surprising given that if the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) wins this case, it could send a signal to regulators around the world on how to tackle proprietary trading by investment banks where Wall Street's giants, sitting on privileged information, play the market with their own capital. Sounds like the banks in New York are pretty worried.

I broke the story about the latest development here.

If you want to learn more about the case, you can listen to a radio interview I did last year here.

Related Entries:

Permalink: Heat on Citigroup case
Tags: Citigroup  lawsuit  ASIC    citigroup  business  heat+citigroup  citigroup+case  hedge+funds 
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/57729
img Addthis img Ask img Blinklist img del.icio.us img Digg img Fark img Facebook img Google img Lycos img Ma.gnolia Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong img Netscape img Netvousz img Newsvine img Reddit img StumbleUpon img Slashdot img Tailrank img Technorati img Wink img Yahoo

Vote for Heat on Citigroup case:

  • Currently 9.00/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 9.00 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
 
Subscribe
Share It
RSSrss
See all blog subscribe options
Google google
What is RSS?
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
Newsletter

TwitterFollow us on Twitter!