soxfirst
Michael Oxley: effects of SOX are overstated
Filed in archive SOX by leon on July 6, 2007
newsox.jpg
In recent months, I have looked at how Sarbanes-Oxley's co-writer Michael Oxley has joined a law firm to help companies get around Sarbox, taken on another paid gig at Nasdaq and blamed the problems with SOX on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Now in an interview with the Houston Chronicle, Mr Oxley has more or less told Sarbox critics to have a cold shower. If the US markets are less attractive to investors, he says, it's not the fault of the law he co-created.

"My message to the capital markets is 'Welcome to globalization.'

"The steel industry and auto industry have all been hit by globalization, so what makes New York think it's any different?

"These markets have matured in London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and not only their economies but their capital markets, and that's a good thing.

"A few things to keep in mind: a lot of the recent big IPO deals to come out on foreign markets were formerly state-owned enterprises, from France and China, for instance. Well, guess what? They're not going to list in New York. Also, it's a lot more expensive to have an IPO in the U.S. because the fees for the investment banks are 7 percent. It's 2 percent in Europe. If you're going to do a multimillion-dollar IPO it's a big difference, but you never hear that in New York. That factor is a lot more expensive than compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley."

To an extent, he is dead right. The forces of globalization are reshaping world markets, and New York is no exception. But he can't deny that listing in the US is now more costly.

The other interesting point is Oxley's claim that the now defunct accounting Andersen was a political sacrifice. Killing it was punishment for aiding and abetting Enron.

"I just think it was a political decision. Andersen could have been fined, they could have had all sorts of sanctions, they could have had monitor-ship. They could have been held up as a model for reform within, and I think we just missed the boat on that. There's now very little competition among accounting firms, and where you don't have competition, it drives up the costs."

How wise we are in retrospect. Too bad he didn't say anything at the time.



Permalink: Michael Oxley: effects of SOX are overstated
Tags: Michael  Oxley  SarbanesOxley  Andersen  oxley  michael+oxley  oxley+effects  effects+overstated 
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/79555
img Addthis img Ask img Blinklist img del.icio.us img Digg img Fark img Facebook img Google img Lycos img Ma.gnolia Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong img Netscape img Netvousz img Newsvine img Reddit img StumbleUpon img Slashdot img Tailrank img Technorati img Wink img Yahoo

Vote for Michael Oxley: effects of SOX are overstated:

  • Currently 9.00/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 9.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
 
Subscribe
Share It
RSSrss
See all blog subscribe options
Google google
What is RSS?
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
Newsletter

TwitterFollow us on Twitter!