Filed in archive
Ethics
by leon on November 23, 2006

The death last week of economist Milton Friedman has prompted plenty of comments about his attacks on corporate social responsibility.
The social responsibility of business, Friedman famously said, was to increase its profits.
Joel Makower in his WorldChanging blog argues that the "doctrinaire Friedmanesque line" ignores the fact that you can run a business and be socially responsible. "We know better now," Makower says.
Actually, the whole debate about profits versus purpose is a false dichotomy and I think Friedman, deep down, would have acknowledged this. I explain why in my piece here.
Friedman argued that it might make business sense for a company to build closer links with the community. Just don't call it corporate social responsibility, he said.
Consider for example the way businesses, including Wal-Mart, are building communities, as detailed in this piece from Fast Company.
So is this corporate social responsibility, or is it about the bottom line?
Does it really matter?
Tags:
Milton
Friedman
corporate
social
responsibility
corporate
social+responsibility
corporate+social
mil
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/43508
Mr Wong
Vote for Milton Friedman and corporate social responsibility:
|
Rating: 8.55 out of 11 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
IndianPad
Sox First: Milton Friedman and corporate social responsibility posted at IndianPad.com
Response from:
The death last week of economist Milton Friedman has prompted plenty of comments about his attacks on corporate social responsibility. But look closer, the differences might be cosmetic!
Response from:
The Boring Made Dull
Economics and Social Policy XXIII is up!
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |















