soxfirst
SOX on IPOs
Filed in archive SOX by leon on August 5, 2006
SOX on IPOs
Congressman Tom Feeney is telling everyone who cares to listen that Sarbanes-Oxley is driving companies away from the United States and that foreign companies that once would have listed in the US, the world's biggest capital market, are now choosing places like London and Hong Kong instead, all because of the US corporate governance regime.

For more details about his claims, check this report.

You have to put these claims in some sort of perspective. The biggest market for IPOs by value remains the new york stock exchange. And the picture seems to be a lot more complicated than what Feeney suggests.

Truth be told, there are many reasons why some companies are not listing in the US, and Sarbanes-Oxley is only one.

The main reason why companies are choosing to list overseas is because of the fees charged by Wall Street investment banks, writes Alan Murray in The Wall Street Journal.

The banks, he says, charge 6.5 to 7 per cent of the value of the shares offered, compared with 3 to 4 per cent in Europe and even lower in Asia.

You can read the full WSJ piece here.

An extension of the argument comes from Daniel Gross in Slate.

Apart from the fees, Gross also blames the fees paid to lawyers, accountants, printers and investor relations professionals. And as he says, with all the wealth, experience, and infrastructure around the world, IPOs are now becoming a commodity, and when you're dealing with commodities, you are competing on price.

As former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Harvey Pitt says in this interview here, the forces of globalisation have changed everything,

"The fact is that dynamics in the marketplace are making the issue of where a company has its stock listed largely irrelevant. What's much more relevant is who owns it. What we've seen is that the Sarbanes-Oxley standard is effectively becoming the de facto world standard and therefore, I'm less concerned that we're going to lose listings".

There's no doubt that Sarbanes-Oxley would be a deterrent for some companies wanting to list, particularly the smaller ones.

But let's not get carried away. It's only one of many reasons driving the change.

Permalink: SOX on IPOs
Tags: IPOs  SarbanesOxley  ipos  corporate  business  more  sarbanes+oxley  small+business  corporate+governance 
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/31085
img Addthis img Ask img Blinklist img del.icio.us img Digg img Fark img Facebook img Google img Lycos img Ma.gnolia Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong img Netscape img Netvousz img Newsvine img Reddit img StumbleUpon img Slashdot img Tailrank img Technorati img Wink img Yahoo

Vote for SOX on IPOs:

  • Currently 10.00/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 10.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
 
Subscribe
Share It
RSSrss
See all blog subscribe options
Google google
What is RSS?
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
Newsletter

TwitterFollow us on Twitter!