Filed in archive
Ethics
by leon on September 19, 2006

But commentator Earl Ofari Hutchinson begs to differ in this provocative piece in AlterNet.
While the show has been lambasted, the reality is that self-segregation in America is thriving and the racial divide in business and society is as wide as ever.
Hutchinson writes: "Despite the well-publicized shove to the top of black executives at American Express, Merrill Lynch, and AOL Time Warner, black CEOs are still a rarity at most of the Fortune 1000 corporations. The overwhelming majority of senior managers at these companies are white males. Many blacks discover that departments or divisions within the same company are top heavy with black employees and managers while others are virtually lily-white.
"Years later many still find themselves stuck in the same dead-end positions, or stacked into the corporate ghetto jobs or positions such as director, VP, or manager of community relations, or equal employment opportunity or human resources, or assigned to oversee special markets (i.e. black or minority)."
He has a good point. But turning it into entertainment is unlikely to make Americans address the issue.
Permalink: The ethics of "Survivor" revisited
Tags:
Survivor
race
segregation
Earl
Ofari
Hutchinson
ethics
ethics+survivor
survivor+revisited
hedge+fund
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/36512
Mr Wong
Vote for The ethics of "Survivor" revisited:
|
Rating: 10.00 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
IndianPad
Sox First: The ethics of 'Survivor' revisited posted at IndianPad.com
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |















