Filed in archive
Accounting
by leon on November 24, 2005

Yeah right!!! OK, the decision not to prosecute makes sense after the US Supreme Court overturned the criminal case in May. But remember, that was for charges of obstruction of justice for destroying documents related to Enron. The Andersen case always reminded me of the way the law caught up with al capone, not on charges of being a gangster and conspiracy to murder, but on tax evasion. Andersen's real offence was punishing good auditors and rewarding the ones who did whatever corrupt companies asked them to do and, as a result, aiding and abetting corporate malfeasance.
There are still big problems with the accounting industry. Looks like the Big Four have more power than ever before, and companies are still tempted to fudge their numbers. These problems don't look like going away.
And in another sign that the ghost of Andersen is still with us, the move by ex-Andersen partner David Duncan to have his guilty plea withdrawn could hurt the prosecution of the Enron case. Dropping the case, allows Duncan to file the motion to withdraw the plea. And without a plea agreement, he just might be unwilling to testify against Kenneth Lay and Jeff Skilling.
Permalink: The ghost of Andersen
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/11446
Mr Wong
Vote for The ghost of Andersen:
|
Rating: 10.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |















