soxfirst
The problem with deferred prosecutions
Filed in archive corporate crime by leon on June 9, 2008
newgavel.jpg


Back in April, I did a blog entry looking at the disturbing trend in the US justice system for prosecutors to do special deals with companies accused of wrongdoing in the form of deferred prosecutions.

Some good insights into this last month from political writer Cheri Cabot . As she points out, it's not just a legal question. It's a deeply political issue. "Besides the problem of adverse publicity, companies have the potential of being barred from doing business with federal, state and local governments," Cabot writes. "That could put a crimp in those no-bid contracts the Bush Administration is so fond of."

Russell Mokhiber, Editor of corporate crime Reporter sheds more light on the issue in this interview with David Uhlmann, former head of the Environmental Crimes Section at the Justice Department. Uhlmann says it's simply wrong and bad application of the law.

But no doubt, these sweetheart deals will continue while this administration is in place. One of its many damaging legacies.



Permalink: The problem with deferred prosecutions
Tags: deferred  prosecutions  David  Ulmann  2007  deferred+prosecutions  conrad+black  book+yours 
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/125812
img Addthis img Ask img Blinklist img del.icio.us img Digg img Fark img Facebook img Google img Lycos img Ma.gnolia Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong img Netscape img Netvousz img Newsvine img Reddit img StumbleUpon img Slashdot img Tailrank img Technorati img Wink img Yahoo

Vote for The problem with deferred prosecutions:

  • Currently 10.00/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 10.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
 
Subscribe
Share It
RSSrss
See all blog subscribe options
Google google
What is RSS?
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
Newsletter

TwitterFollow us on Twitter!